Pope Francis came into the Vatican with a mandate to change the way its bureaucracy functions (or disfunctions), in the wake of scandals, leaks and power struggles that have embarrassed the church. It seems to me that he’s taking that task seriously, by laying the spiritual groundwork for change.
He’s approaching the various Vatican environments not so much as the new boss, but as the new pastor.
I think that’s one big reason why he’s decided to continue to live in the Domus Sanctae Marthae, the Vatican guest house, instead of moving into the formal papal apartment. In the Domus, he’s a few steps away from St. Peter’s, as well as the Vatican City governor’s office, and his morning liturgies are accessible to Vatican employees.
In the Apostolic Palace, the pope would have been surrounded by Secretariat of State offices and the usual filters. In effect, the Domus provides a much better pastoral base for evangelizing the Vatican.
Blogging is light, now that we’re rehearsing for As You Like It. On top of that, @viola_illyria had her computer blow up on her so there’s serious geekery afoot redoing the household infrastructure. Hoping to get a few things lined up, though, and there’s a serious academic workflow post hovering in the ether.
Tightwind.net has it right:
Google makes relatively little from Android while one company—Samsung—makes more operating income from Android than Google as a whole. Think about that! Google is doing the hard work of developing the operating system and applications, but Samsung is capturing all of the revenue and income. Google’s Android strategy failed.
The only problem with the notion that Google’s exit from the trap is selling devices (Glass, Chromebooks, Motorola-made Google-branded phones) is that we have very little evidence that Google will be any good at it. Google TV, anyone?
This strategy requires Google to attack directly into the arena dominated by Samsung and Apple. I think I’ve seen that before.
Luis Palau: Why It Matters that Pope Francis Drinks Maté with Evangelicals: “One day I said to him, ‘You seem to love the Bible a lot,’ and he said, ‘You know, my financial manager [for the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires] … is an evangelical Christian.’ I said, ‘Why would that be?’ And he said, ‘Well, I can trust him, and we spend hours reading the Bible and praying and drinking maté [an Argentine green tea].'”
As husband to a tea-drinking Evangelical, I can relate! (But not to the maté, I’ll take other kinds of tea.)
Pope Francis I – Ross Douthat: “First, whatever correlations of factions and forces within the conclave produced this result, Bergoglio won relatively swiftly, which — joined to his runner-up status last time, in a conclave that had a very different slate of cardinal electors — suggests a man with deep reservoirs of support and goodwill among his fellow prelates. Even if he was a compromise choice of some sort, his fellow electors were clearly quite happy to make it.”
A hopeful observation; may it be so! And a style note: until/unless some future Pope takes the name, it’s not Francis I, it’s simply Francis.
Undoubtedly the beginning of a mighty flood, here’s John Allen from last week with a pre-election profile of the man would be Francis. It’s a good take from one of the premier US reporters on things Vatican.
Something more rare than rubies… Penn Jillette provides a sterling example of intellectual integrity. He’s an atheist, but he’s more capable of taking people at their word and respecting the content of beliefs he does not share than Piers Morgan could ever be.
There’s a few theological bobbles here and there, but that would be nitpicking. Well worth three minutes of life to watch it.
One for the Georgetown people in particular, but good for anyone. Insight from one of the teachers who contributed most to where & what I am today.
The one-stop shopping place for information on the cardinal-electors. Great resource!
We have picked up a teaching habit that is more presumed than prescribed, and we can’t seem to stop.
John Allen, excellent as always.